Struggling AUTHORS

Home     Author Research     Computer Literate     Links     Contact Us      
Having your work professionally critiqued
By Richard Grayling

 

After completing the first draft of my novel, Green Kiddies, I uploaded the opening chapters to the You Write On website. The feedback (both good and bad) and support I received helped me to shape and rework the chapters so that they became, in my opinion, the best they could be. I also used Authonomy briefly but felt I needed the 'enforced' structure of a credit system to approach critiquing properly (there was just way too many good books to read on there and I didn't have enough time to do all of the read-swaps offered!).

 

  

So, after a year of waxing and polishing, I decided to submit my work to a literary agent. Suffice to say I got a standard rejection letter which left me unsure of where I had gone wrong. Was my synopsis badly written, was the work not commercial enough, had I spelt the agents name wrong...? I made the decision to invest in a professional critique using the You Write On website's connections and paid £89 for a critique of the first 8,000 [approx] words of my novel.  I waited patiently for the critique to arrive - which it did exactly when it was supposed to - and used the time to make a start on my next book.

 

 I was most impressed with the depth of the critique and so have decided to share some of it with other Struggling Authors. I have included just a couple of the comments from the critique below but if you would like a copy of the full document and/or a copy of the version of Green Kiddies they were critiquing, please use the contact form to request it.

 

In summary - Using the feedback given from an editor in 'the trade' (they work for Orion Publishing) has helped me to make the decision to do a rewrite of Green Kiddies in the near future. 

 


 

Editor's critique:

 

Synopsis:

While your synopsis gives a good overview of the story, it doesn’t really detail the main events of the plot or indicate how the story will progress. If you are submitting an unsolicited manuscript to a publisher (i.e. not through a reputable agent), most publishing houses will only accept a synopsis and the first three chapters. If your synopsis doesn’t tell the reader what will happen following on from those three chapters, it can be very hard to get a sense of what the book is about.

 

Pace:

 

I think the narrative needs a stronger and clearer dramatic drive, augmented by a greater sense of urgency.  Some cutting and restructuring of scenes will help with this. While the unhurried, reflective approach fits well with the story, the lack of pace can create stagnation in your narrative.

 

Plot:

I thought the opening scene was really good – the reader quickly gets a sense of who Graham is and the predicament he is in. You subtly build up the tension, but you never let the action take dominance over the characterisation. Graham always remains at the forefront of the plot. His crisis instantly aligns the reader with him and has them rooting for his escape.

Tone:

 

You need to find the balance between making your characters seem believable and realistic and your plot gripping, but still incorporating flashes of humour. Tone is one of the hardest elements to master in a novel, and consequently one of the most important. As a writer, you need to know the style of your book and what readership you are aiming for, and to adapt the tone of the novel accordingly.

Page-by-page notes:

p.7: ‘My mouth went dry as my palms did the opposite’ – great line!

p.9: with sentences like this: ‘I eventually had to make my excuses and leave as the clock was ticking and I was better off not being around the next time somebody knocked on my door’ it feels like you are stating the obvious. You need to show the reader this, not tell them.

Conclusion:

 I thought there was some good material here and it is a really promising start, and I want to reiterate again that I think this novel has real potential. You are wonderful at characterisation, but the pacing and structure of your plot needs some attention.


 As I have said, the above are only extracts from the complete critique and the full document can be emailed to you upon request.

To have your own work critiqued, please go via the You Write On website or click on this link

Professional Critique

If you would like to find out more about peer critiques, please click on this link

 

Richard